TODO
I don’t believe that Dr Mikes’ affiliations were sufficiently explored and represented during the Episode. The fact that he does private practice is a prime example.
See A12. Dr. Smith Credentials, track record and potential conflict of interest
<aside> 🚧 The Panorama team has failed to challenge the consensus that the NHS ADHD assessment is of superior quality and to question the credentials and affiliation of NHS contributors, especially Dr. Smith who was and is also practicing privately at the time
</aside>
<aside> 🚧 TODO
</aside>
Section 4.3.12 states:
We should not automatically assume that contributors from other organisations (such as academics, journalists, researchers and representatives of charities and think-tanks) are unbiased. Appropriate information about their affiliations, funding and particular viewpoints should be made available to the audience, when relevant to the context