Overview

TODO

This is already included in A05. Unrepresentative NHS assessment, failing to challenge consensus but can stand on it’s own once fleshed out.

Commentary

Concise (55 words)

<aside> ✍️ To continue to claim that the representation of the NHS assessment as “typical” was “fair”, “balanced” or “accurate” is disingenuous and arguably violates Section 3.3.16 - Materially Misleading Audiences. Claims of Prof. Adamou about 50% reassessment are taken grossly out of context, who himself says that “… this rate should not be generalised across the UK”

</aside>

Detailed (X words)

<aside> 🚧 TODO

</aside>

Details

TODO

Raw

Credits

TODO: try to, when summarising, credit the main contributing thoughts (where possible, some aren’t identifiable / not direct quotes but rather Mikes’ mind-melt after reading the subreddit for hours)